EU Omnibus: Summary of Proposed Changes

The EU Omnibus is set to amend several key sustainability regulations, simplifying compliance obligations for in-scope entities. If approved, it will modify four major frameworks: CSRD, CSDDD, the Taxonomy Regulation, and CBAM.

The EU Omnibus revises four key regulatory frameworks: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Taxonomy Regulation. It also adjusts the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

Defined Terms

  • CSRD: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive requires in-scope entities to report on the impact of their corporate activities on the environment and society by using a double materiality assessment; (i) financial materiality and (ii) impact materiality 
  • CSDDD: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive requires in-scope entities to assess and address environmental and human rights risks in their value chains
  • The Taxonomy Regulation: is a classification system for in-scope entities’ economic activities to determine whether such activities qualify as “sustainable”. Activities must be measured against six environmental objectives to understand whether they “substantially contribute” to any one objective while not doing any significant harm to the other objectives. The resulting alignment is intended to reduce unsubstantiated sustainability claims and limit greenwashing. 
  • CBAM: the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a fair-pricing tool for carbon-intensive imports to promote competitiveness of EU companies subject to strict emissions regulations in their operations.

 

Summary of Changes:

Directive/Regulation

Criteria

Original Requirement

Omnibus Proposal

CSRD

Employee Threshold

Companies with >250 employees

Companies with >1,000 employees

Non-EU Turnover Threshold

>EUR150M Turnover

>EUR450M Turnover

Implementation

Wave 2 and 3 companies reporting in 2026 and 2027

Wave 2 and 3 companies reporting in 2028 and 2029

Assurance Requirements

“Reasonable assurance” to be phased in

“Limited assurance” is sufficient

Sector-Specific Standards

Sector-specific standards to be drafted

Eliminates requirement for sector-specific standards

Materiality

Double materiality assessment required

No change

 

CSDDD

Implementation

Initial compliance:

2027

Initial compliance:

2028

Scope of Assessment

Value chain

Direct suppliers only

Monitoring

Annual monitoring

Monitoring ~every five years

Contract Management

Terminate contracts with suppliers in violation of standards

Suspend contracts with suppliers in violation of standards, and attempt remediation

Penalties

>5% of global turnover

No universal penalties

 

EU Taxonomy

Turnover Threshold

Mandatory for all companies reporting to CSRD

Companies reporting to CSRD with >EUR450M turnover

 

CBAM

Scope

All importers included

Small importers exempt (~90% reduction in reporters, 1% reduction in emissions)

 

Next Steps:

The EU Omnibus, if passed, will significantly reduce the regulatory burden for in-scope entities. Now, the proposal must be approved by the European Parliament and Council.

As of today, the changes outlined here are not in effect, and deadlines for reporting under the current regulatory framework remain in play.  However, expedited review and approval for the delay to implementation has been requested.

We will be watching the updates and announcements closely, and we welcome you to get in touch with us at [email protected].

Share the Post:

SilverVision Archive

2026 PRI Reporting Guide

PRI’s 2026 Transparency Reporting season is fast approaching, and for many Signatories, this year’s process will look very different from prior cycles. With a significantly revised framework, fewer indicators, and new mandatory requirements, now is the time to understand what has changed before the reporting window opens on May 6 and closes on July 29.

Read More »

Regulation S-P Amendments Shift the Compliance and Cybersecurity Landscape: What the Amendments Mean and How Firms Can Navigate Them

The SEC’s amendments to Regulation S-P (Reg S-P) reflect heightened expectations for how financial firms protect customer information, respond to incidents, and oversee service providers. With tighter notification timelines and more explicit documentation requirements, the amendments serve to remind investment advisers that compliance and cybersecurity are operational priorities.

Read More »

Fizza’s Guide to What’s Inside – Q1 2026

Q1 2026 has been a reminder that for private fund managers, regulatory change is not slowing down and neither are the expectations that come with it. In the upcoming edition of Silver’s Regulatory Recap, we are focusing on several developments that we believe are especially important to have on your radar right now.

Read More »

2025 Sustainability Regulation Recap: The Updates That Matter and How to Prepare for 2026

The past few years have produced a seemingly unending deluge of changes and updates to sustainability regulations and standards, and 2025 was no different. In this article, Silver’s Sustainability Risk & Strategy team summarizes all the activity from 2025 and provides key items investment managers need to be aware of, along with practical steps for addressing these changes in 2026.

Read More »

Navigating the SEC’s 2026 Exam Priorities

The SEC’s 2026 Examination Priorities signal tighter scrutiny for private fund advisers, with expectations increasingly tied to real-world risk and demonstrable controls. Silver breaks down the 2026 focus areas with lessons from 2025 exams and outlines three practical actions firms can take now to strengthen exam readiness.

Read More »