EU Omnibus: Summary of Proposed Changes

The EU Omnibus is set to amend several key sustainability regulations, simplifying compliance obligations for in-scope entities. If approved, it will modify four major frameworks: CSRD, CSDDD, the Taxonomy Regulation, and CBAM.

The EU Omnibus revises four key regulatory frameworks: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Taxonomy Regulation. It also adjusts the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

Defined Terms

  • CSRD: the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive requires in-scope entities to report on the impact of their corporate activities on the environment and society by using a double materiality assessment; (i) financial materiality and (ii) impact materiality 
  • CSDDD: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive requires in-scope entities to assess and address environmental and human rights risks in their value chains
  • The Taxonomy Regulation: is a classification system for in-scope entities’ economic activities to determine whether such activities qualify as “sustainable”. Activities must be measured against six environmental objectives to understand whether they “substantially contribute” to any one objective while not doing any significant harm to the other objectives. The resulting alignment is intended to reduce unsubstantiated sustainability claims and limit greenwashing. 
  • CBAM: the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a fair-pricing tool for carbon-intensive imports to promote competitiveness of EU companies subject to strict emissions regulations in their operations.

 

Summary of Changes:

Directive/Regulation

Criteria

Original Requirement

Omnibus Proposal

CSRD

Employee Threshold

Companies with >250 employees

Companies with >1,000 employees

Non-EU Turnover Threshold

>EUR150M Turnover

>EUR450M Turnover

Implementation

Wave 2 and 3 companies reporting in 2026 and 2027

Wave 2 and 3 companies reporting in 2028 and 2029

Assurance Requirements

“Reasonable assurance” to be phased in

“Limited assurance” is sufficient

Sector-Specific Standards

Sector-specific standards to be drafted

Eliminates requirement for sector-specific standards

Materiality

Double materiality assessment required

No change

 

CSDDD

Implementation

Initial compliance:

2027

Initial compliance:

2028

Scope of Assessment

Value chain

Direct suppliers only

Monitoring

Annual monitoring

Monitoring ~every five years

Contract Management

Terminate contracts with suppliers in violation of standards

Suspend contracts with suppliers in violation of standards, and attempt remediation

Penalties

>5% of global turnover

No universal penalties

 

EU Taxonomy

Turnover Threshold

Mandatory for all companies reporting to CSRD

Companies reporting to CSRD with >EUR450M turnover

 

CBAM

Scope

All importers included

Small importers exempt (~90% reduction in reporters, 1% reduction in emissions)

 

Next Steps:

The EU Omnibus, if passed, will significantly reduce the regulatory burden for in-scope entities. Now, the proposal must be approved by the European Parliament and Council.

As of today, the changes outlined here are not in effect, and deadlines for reporting under the current regulatory framework remain in play.  However, expedited review and approval for the delay to implementation has been requested.

We will be watching the updates and announcements closely, and we welcome you to get in touch with us at [email protected].

Share the Post:

SilverVision Archive

Europe in Flux, U.S. Division: Q3 Sustainability Trends for Private Fund Managers and RIAs

Silver monitored key regulatory and market developments and in the US, activity ranged from efforts to roll back the EPA’s endangerment findings to court challenges over ESG proxy adviser rules to updated DOJ guidance on DEI programs. In the UK and EU, regulators advanced sustainability reporting consultations and trade agreements that may affect compliance obligations. Global industry alliances also saw shifts, including the suspension of the Net-Zero Banking Alliance and the release of SBTi’s new net-zero standard for financial institutions.

Read More »

Where Innovation Meets Oversight: Managing Artificial Intelligence, Crypto and Cybersecurity Compliance

In today’s market, AI, crypto and cybersecurity are rapidly reshaping opportunities and risks for private fund managers and RIAs. Regulators are signaling both openness, such as new crypto listing standards, and heightened scrutiny, particularly around AI oversight, token classification and cybersecurity expectations. Firms that integrate compliance into their innovation strategies will be best positioned to capture opportunities while protecting clients and reputations.

Read More »

Navigating Cybersecurity Compliance Amid Global Instability

With geopolitical tensions on the rise, cybersecurity risks have been heightened for RIAs and private fund managers, requiring firms to go beyond the basics and build cyber compliance programs that are strategic, proactive and SEC exam-ready. This roadmap will help RIAs and fund managers navigate this evolving ecosystem with clarity and confidence.

Read More »