SEC Thumps Insight for Charging ‘Excess’ Management Fees

Silver’s CEO, Fizza Khan, and Compliance Manager, Tyler Schoenberg, recently provided commentary to FundFire about the SEC’s settlement with Insight Partners in an enforcement case alleging the venture capital and buyout manager charged excess management fees to clients. Read the full article here.

Silver’s CEO, Fizza Khan, and Compliance Manager, Tyler Schoenberg, recently provided commentary to FundFire about the SEC’s recent settlement with Insight Partners in an enforcement case alleging that the $79 billion venture capital and buyout manager charged excess fees to clients by failing to implement an adequate process to account for “impaired” portfolio companies across more than a dozen of its funds.

Commenting on whether a common challenge for private equity and venture capital managers is compliance with excess management fees, Fizza remarks, “[w]e see this as less of an issue of excess management fees and more of an issue of inaccurate or inadequate disclosures. Here, it was not so much that the fees Insight charged were high, it is that they were either in excess of what they should have been under the terms of the LPA [limited partnership agreement], or there were under-disclosures related to the criteria used to determine the ‘permanent impairment’ fee reduction.”

When asked what steps private equity and venture capital managers can take to ensure they are compliant, Tyler points out that the Insight case doesn’t break any new ground. “There is nothing new here,” he said. “But this highlights the importance of digging deep in those annual compliance reviews and paying close attention to fee and expense allocation in particular this year.”

To read the full article please visit the FundFire website here.

 

Share the Post:

SilverVision Archive

2026 PRI Reporting Guide

PRI’s 2026 Transparency Reporting season is fast approaching, and for many Signatories, this year’s process will look very different from prior cycles. With a significantly revised framework, fewer indicators, and new mandatory requirements, now is the time to understand what has changed before the reporting window opens on May 6 and closes on July 29.

Read More »

Regulation S-P Amendments Shift the Compliance and Cybersecurity Landscape: What the Amendments Mean and How Firms Can Navigate Them

The SEC’s amendments to Regulation S-P (Reg S-P) reflect heightened expectations for how financial firms protect customer information, respond to incidents, and oversee service providers. With tighter notification timelines and more explicit documentation requirements, the amendments serve to remind investment advisers that compliance and cybersecurity are operational priorities.

Read More »

Fizza’s Guide to What’s Inside – Q1 2026

Q1 2026 has been a reminder that for private fund managers, regulatory change is not slowing down and neither are the expectations that come with it. In the upcoming edition of Silver’s Regulatory Recap, we are focusing on several developments that we believe are especially important to have on your radar right now.

Read More »

2025 Sustainability Regulation Recap: The Updates That Matter and How to Prepare for 2026

The past few years have produced a seemingly unending deluge of changes and updates to sustainability regulations and standards, and 2025 was no different. In this article, Silver’s Sustainability Risk & Strategy team summarizes all the activity from 2025 and provides key items investment managers need to be aware of, along with practical steps for addressing these changes in 2026.

Read More »

Navigating the SEC’s 2026 Exam Priorities

The SEC’s 2026 Examination Priorities signal tighter scrutiny for private fund advisers, with expectations increasingly tied to real-world risk and demonstrable controls. Silver breaks down the 2026 focus areas with lessons from 2025 exams and outlines three practical actions firms can take now to strengthen exam readiness.

Read More »